Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G60's general score of 79.5. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro construction has the same thickness than the Motorola Moto G60, but it's just a little lighter. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little bit better screen than Moto G60, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixels density. The Moto G60 counts with a processing unit that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro one, both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Moto G60 counts with more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto G60 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Moto G60 features a greater camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing images in low light environments, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a much more MP back-facing camera.
Moto G60 has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.