Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Blue and Red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than Moto G7 Plus, having a global score of 81 against 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a newer cellphone than Moto G7 Plus, although it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Moto G7 Plus has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a little better pixel density, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite bigger display. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a little better hardware performance than Moto G7 Plus. They have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Moto G7 Plus has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus also counts with a way higher video definition and a way bigger sensor which offers a way better image and video quality.
The Motorola Moto G7 Plus features as much storage for games and applications as Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB and equal 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.