Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Cosmic blue and Crystal pink |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 14.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the Moto G8 Plus, with an 81 score against 77.6. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a heavier and just a little bit thicker phone than Moto G8 Plus. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a bit more pixels per screen inch and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Moto G8 Plus and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro count with extremely similar memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little better hardware performance than Moto G8 Plus. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus also has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and a back camera with a much better resolution.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.