Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | -- |
| Black | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a bit better than the Moto G84's general score of 80.9. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version and Moto G84 has Android 13 version. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a very superior processor than Motorola Moto G84, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Moto G84 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels count per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger screen. The Moto G84 has a greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Moto G84 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto G84 also counts with a way higher resolution back camera, better 60 fps video frame rates and a lot bigger camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
Motorola Moto G84 has better battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.