Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-09-07 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Black | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G9 Plus, with a general score of 81 against 80.5. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G9 Plus has Android 10 version. The Galaxy XCover Pro body is a little thicker but a little lighter than the Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and both of them were released only a few months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels in each display inch. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G9 Plus. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Moto G9 Plus features a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures.
Moto G9 Plus has a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Moto G9 Plus also has 64 GB more internal memory. Moto G9 Plus counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.