Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro construction is newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it is notably thicker and incredibly heavier. Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a really longer battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 2730mAh. Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a way smaller sensor capturing much lower quality pictures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a lot higher resolution back camera.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.