Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play's global score of 76.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, it's heavier and a lot thicker. Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better looking screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a bit greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a little bigger display.
The Moto Z3 Play counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z3 Play also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a way tinier sensor which gives a way lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same aperture, the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 35 percent larger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is also a bargain compared to others, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.