Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black | Oxford blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 84.6 score against 81. The Motorola One 5G body is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro, even when they were released only a couple of months apart. Motorola One 5G features a display that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro one, and although the Motorola One 5G has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a little bit larger screen, they both have the same screen pixel density.
The Motorola One 5G's processor is just as good as the processing unit in Galaxy XCover Pro, both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. Motorola One 5G features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the Motorola One 5G also has a much bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures, a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
The Motorola One 5G counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Motorola One 5G is also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.