Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPS |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace has an overall score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. Motorola One 5G Ace is a just a little bit lighter phone than Galaxy XCover Pro, but both are equally thin. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better processing power than Motorola One 5G Ace. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 cores. Motorola One 5G Ace features a better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Motorola One 5G Ace features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% larger battery capacity.
Motorola One 5G Ace not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the Galaxy XCover Pro, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.