Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is just a bit better than the Motorola One Action's general score of 78.5. Even being the best phone we compare here, the Galaxy XCover Pro construction is heavier and just a little thicker than the Motorola One Action. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Action. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Motorola One Action has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola One Action also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2520 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per display inch. Motorola One Action features a much bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has more internal storage and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4050mAh battery size. The Galaxy XCover Pro takes clearer photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light situations and a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is more expensive than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One Action, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.