Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is just a bit better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 score. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro construction is thicker and just a little heavier than Motorola One Hyper. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide you the same OS features.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Hyper. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a quite greater screen pixel density.
The Motorola One Hyper takes better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs and video in low light environments, it also counts with a much better video definition and a way more megapixels back camera.
The Motorola One Hyper has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs more money than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Hyper. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Motorola One Hyper, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.