Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Motorola One Vision, having an 81 score against 80.7. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy XCover Pro's construction is somewhat thicker and heavier than the Motorola One Vision. The Motorola One Vision has a bit better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola One Vision also has a little higher 1080 x 2520 resolution and a just a bit greater pixel density.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a little faster CPU than Motorola One Vision. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Motorola One Vision has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB, the Motorola One Vision also has 128 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features longer battery duration than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4050mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh. The Motorola One Vision features a superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola One Vision also has a camera with lot more megapixels, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot bigger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.