Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the Motorola One Zoom, getting a score of 81 against 80. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the Motorola One Zoom. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola One Zoom features a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 384 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little faster processor than Motorola One Zoom. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola One Zoom takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also has a way bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy XCover Pro not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.