Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 87 score against 81. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is somewhat lighter and way thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although they were released only a couple of months apart. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding operating system features.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a bit greater pixel quantity per inch in the screen, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit bigger display. Motorola razr (2020) features a better storage to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much larger sensor, a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a way more mega-pixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a way better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 45 percent larger battery size.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.