Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 75.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-09-30 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Nokia 7.2's general score of 75.9. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Nokia 7.2 has Android 10. Even being the best we are comparing, it must be told that it's also somewhat heavier and thicker.
Nokia 7.2 counts with a screen that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro one, both of them have the same count of pixels per display inch, the same 1080 x 2340 resolution and a same size screen. The Nokia 7.2 features a very superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Nokia 7.2 also has 128 GB internal memory.
The Nokia 7.2 features a processor that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro one, and although the Nokia 7.2 has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Nokia 7.2 takes slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photos and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Nokia 7.2 also counts with a lot larger camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy XCover Pro features better battery performance than Nokia 7.2, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.