Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black | Meteor grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, with an 81 score against 80.3. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the newer 11 version while Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10 version. Despite of the fact Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is older and thicker than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, it's design is still just a little bit lighter.
The Galaxy XCover Pro and the Nokia 8 V 5G UW have extremely similar processing units, and although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch of display.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.