Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView, with a general score of 81 against 76.4. Although Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than Nokia 9 PureView, it is way heavier and a lot thicker. Nokia 9 PureView has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy XCover Pro features greater battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 22% larger battery size. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better camera than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a lot smaller sensor which gives a way lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a camera with a much better 25 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
The Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.