Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-11-09 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.65 ounces |
| Black | Midnight Blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4470mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than Nokia X100, getting an 81 score against 77.3. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS, so both should offer identical OS features. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, it must be noted that it's also older, just a little bit thicker and a little heavier.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little better performance than Nokia X100, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly better display than Nokia X100, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels amount per display inch.
Galaxy XCover Pro captures better photos and videos than Nokia X100, although it has a much less MP resolution back facing camera. Nokia X100 counts with a much bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Nokia X100 has a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4470mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.