Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a little bit better than Nokia XR20's overall score of 80.8. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features. The Galaxy XCover Pro is an older phone than the Nokia XR20, but it is noticeably lighter and a bit thinner anyway.
Nokia XR20 has a bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little inferior pixels amount per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite larger display. Nokia XR20 features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Nokia XR20 also has more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Nokia XR20, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Nokia XR20 has a bit longer battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4630mAh battery size against 4050mAh. Nokia XR20 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures, higher video frame rates and a much higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.