Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a score of 81 against 75.8. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro design is a little thicker and just a little heavier than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a screen that is just as good as Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's display, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a quite worse pixels number in each inch in the screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy XCover Pro is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.