Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5S, getting an 81 score against 76.2. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's construction weights the same than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but it is a bit thicker.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 4 GB more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a little lower amount of pixels per display inch, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a little bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better memory capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much more mega-pixels camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.