Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black | Ocean |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2, with an 81 score against 79.7. Although it's the best in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro body is somewhat heavier and notably thicker than OPPO Find X2. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version.
OPPO Find X2 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM. The OPPO Find X2 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a quite larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168px and more pixels per screen inch.
The OPPO Find X2 captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Find X2 also has a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
OPPO Find X2 has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.