Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's overall score of 77.7. Despite being the best in this comparison, we must note that it is also extremely heavier and much thicker. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10, counting with a lot of extra features.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit lower pixel count per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
OPPO Find X2 Neo takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way better quality photos, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.