Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black | Ocean |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, having an 83.1 score against 81. Although OPPO Find X2 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro were released with only a couple months difference, OPPO Find X2 Pro is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter. Both devices we compare here include Android operating system, but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a little better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution, a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a little larger screen.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much better resolution back camera, a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way higher video definition.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.