Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, having a overall score of 81 against 76. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro body is older, somewhat heavier and a lot thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Neo. These phones have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has 8 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit larger screen.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X3 Neo takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, it also counts with a much better video resolution and a camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit better battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4050mAh.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.