Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | -- |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, with a score of 81 against 77. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 operating system. Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, the Galaxy XCover Pro construction is somewhat heavier and notably thicker than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit inferior pixels quantity per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit larger display.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G captures better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a much higher (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a superior battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.