Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has a score of 82.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's global score of 81. These phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has the newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy A13 5G is a newer phone, and it is also somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A13 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a better looking display than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher count of pixels per inch in the display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A13 5G has improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh. The Galaxy A13 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photography, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a way more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.