Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than Galaxy A15 5G, having a global score of 81 against 77.4. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro body is incredibly older, just a little bit heavier and thicker than the Galaxy A15 5G. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A15 5G. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. Galaxy A15 5G features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little lower display pixels density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a quite larger screen.
The Galaxy A15 5G captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy A15 5G has much more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A15 5G counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.