Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | -- |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy A16 5G, with a global score of 81 against 76.2. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a thicker and just a little heavier phone than Galaxy A16 5G. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version while Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a much powerful processor than Galaxy A16 5G. Both of them have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy A16 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a little lower number of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy A16 5G also counts with a little bit larger display.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a much less MP back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photography. Galaxy A16 5G counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage.
The Galaxy A16 5G counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% more battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A16 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A16 5G. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy XCover Pro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A16 5G, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.