Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A21, with an 81 score against 76.1. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A21 has Android 10 version, so it gives you some nice extra features. The Galaxy XCover Pro is a somewhat heavier and thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy A21.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A21, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a much better pixel amount per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A21 features a CPU that is very similar to Galaxy XCover Pro's processing unit, and although the Galaxy A21 has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has a much tinier sensor, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A21, and although they both have an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A21, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A21, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A21. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A21, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.