Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 409 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G76 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A21s, with a overall score of 81 against 77.7. Despite being the best we compare here, the Galaxy XCover Pro design is heavier and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A21s. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A21s has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy XCover Pro features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better screen pixels density and a much higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A21s has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A21s also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A21s, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has 32 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A21s features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.