Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A22's 76.1 global score. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version while Galaxy A22 has Android 12. Even being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy XCover Pro is an older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than the Galaxy A22.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A22. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A22, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A22 has a better storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A22 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A22.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A22, because although it has a worse video definition and a lot worse 25 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.