Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 global score. The Galaxy A22 5G design is newer, thinner and a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 operating system.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro count with similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a bit inferior pixel amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A22 5G. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A22 5G counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.