Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Galaxy A25 5G, with a score of 81 against 79.9. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. Even though the Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device than Galaxy A25 5G, it must be told that it is also a incredibly older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier device.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a really superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy A25 5G features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a little larger screen.
Galaxy A25 5G features a superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking images in low-light environments, it also counts with a much more megapixels camera, a lot bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A25 5G has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.