Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a bit better than Galaxy A30's 79.6 global score. Even though the Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than Galaxy A30, it's heavier and noticeably thicker. The Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A30. Both have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A30, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a bit higher amount of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a way worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A30's storage to install applications and games is very similar to Galaxy XCover Pro's one, they have equal internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.