Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A30s's score of 79.8. These devices come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should count with the same OS features. Despite being the best we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is an extremely heavier and incredibly thicker cellphone than Galaxy A30s.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much greater pixels density and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Samsung Galaxy A30s features a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A30s also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount. Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit better camera than Galaxy A30s. They have the same resolution back camera, the same diafragm aperture, the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A30s, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.