Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, getting a global score of 81 against 79.4. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, Galaxy XCover Pro is an a lot older, just a little heavier and thicker cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. These devices use Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much powerful processor than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a slightly better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting images and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a way better (4K) video definition and a camera with way more MP.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A35 5G features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.