Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A40's 79.6 score. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both of them should give you all the same OS features. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro design is newer than the Galaxy A40's, although it is way thicker and extremely heavier.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A40. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A40 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A40 also counts with a little higher pixels density.
The Galaxy A40's memory capacity for applications and games is just as good as Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's one, they have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A40, because although it has a much tinier back camera sensor taking lot worse quality photos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a F1.7 camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a back camera with much more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A40, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.