Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s general score of 75.8. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's construction is incredibly newer, but much heavier and way thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017). The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) and Galaxy XCover Pro feature extremely similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a bit higher pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger aperture for better low-light images and videos and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.