Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, having an 83.8 score against 81. The Galaxy A50 construction is a lot thinner and incredibly lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although it was released only 11 months before. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro and the Galaxy A50 feature extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy A50 has a just a bit worse number of pixels per display inch, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Galaxy A50 has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A50's processor is just as good as the CPU in Galaxy XCover Pro, both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy A50 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a 25 MP back camera, the same aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A50 also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 1 percent greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.