Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a general score of 86.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover Pro's score of 81. These devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11. The Galaxy A50s is a extremely lighter and extremely thinner cellphone than the Galaxy XCover Pro, even though they were only released 3 months apart.
Galaxy A50s counts with a display that is very similar to the display in Galaxy XCover Pro, because although the Galaxy A50s has a bit worse pixel quantity per screen inch, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has just a bit better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A50s shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photographs and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy A50s has a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A50s also has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.