Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has an overall score of 85.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's global score of 81. The Galaxy A51 design is extremely thinner and noticeably lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although both were released only a few months apart. These phones use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should provide you very similar operating system features.
Galaxy A51 has a screen that is very similar to Galaxy XCover Pro's display, because although the Galaxy A51 has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A51 has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A51 and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro count with really similar processing units, both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. The Galaxy A51 shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a lot better 48 MP resolution back camera and a lot larger back camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has a 1 percent greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.