Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Galaxy XCover Pro, getting a 90.8 score against 81. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should give very similar OS features. Although Samsung Galaxy A51 5G and Galaxy XCover Pro were released only a couple of months apart, Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a display that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's screen, because although the Galaxy A51 5G has a little worse screen density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite larger display. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a CPU that's very similar to Galaxy XCover Pro's processor, and although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a higher amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A51 5G shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy A51 5G is also by far the cheapest, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.