Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, getting a global score of 90.7 against 81. The Galaxy A52 is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. Galaxy A52's CPU is very similar to Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's processing unit, and although the Galaxy A52 has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52 counts with a screen that is just as good as the screen in Galaxy XCover Pro, because although the Galaxy A52 has a little bit inferior pixels number in each screen inch, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger display. The Galaxy A52 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution, a back-facing camera with a way better resolution and a way bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.