Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, having a score of 91.3 against 81. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version, so it counts with some additional features and performance improvements. The Galaxy A52 5G is a newer device, and it is also somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a CPU that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's processor, and although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a higher amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A52 5G features a screen that is very similar to the Galaxy XCover Pro one, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality, a lot bigger sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality and a lot better resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.