Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. Both phones we are comparing come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. Galaxy A52s is a newer device, and it is also somewhat lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Galaxy A52s features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A52s also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy XCover Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A52s both feature really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52s has a little lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A52s has a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures and a way better 3840x2160 video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.