Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A6's 75.8 global score. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a newer cellphone than Galaxy A6, but it is much thicker and incredibly heavier. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a little bigger screen, a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a higher amount of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 35 percent bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy XCover Pro takes a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has a lot tinier back camera sensor which offers a way lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same video resolution, the same aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.