Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy A7 (2017), getting an 81 score against 75.8. Galaxy XCover Pro's body is a lot newer, but way thicker and somewhat heavier than Galaxy A7 (2017). Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a bit larger display, a just a bit greater pixel density and a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little better battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a way more mega pixels camera and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.