Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 general score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10, counting with some extra features and enhanced performance. Galaxy XCover Pro is a newer phone than Samsung Galaxy A70, but it's much thicker and somewhat heavier.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A70 counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A70 also has more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting much worse quality videos and pictures, they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, a same size aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A70, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.