Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has a general score of 87.5, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. Galaxy A71 is a somewhat lighter and notably thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although both of them were released only 0 months apart. Both of these devices use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a little greater screen density. The Galaxy A71 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A71 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A71 and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro both feature similar processing units, and although the Galaxy A71 has more RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy A71 features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A71 takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a much higher (4K) video quality and a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A71 is also cheap compared to the Galaxy XCover Pro, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.